Overview

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

41.4

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

52 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

64.7 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 52%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 10.5 6.3 7.7 7.3 14.9 10.7 18.4 75.8 52.5% 0.6
Article, other 4.3 1.3 3.0 2.5 1.7 3.3 6.2 22.4 7.5% 0.1
Conference paper, peer review NA 0.8 NA NA NA NA NA 0.8 0.0% 0.7
Conference paper, other 14.5 14.8 16.5 7.0 4.2 5.0 2.7 64.7 0.0% 0.0
Book NA 5.0 1.6 3.0 1.3 3.5 3.0 17.4 0.0% 0.1
Anthology (editor) 1.8 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.5 6.6 0.0% 0.2
Chapter in book 7.2 19.7 16.1 18.2 28.6 16.7 3.9 110.3 0.0% 0.2
Article, book review 5.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 7.0 6.0 31.0 54.8% 0.0
Report 1.0 1.8 1.7 2.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 9.3 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1.0 NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 17 10 11 15 20 19 30 122 58.2% 1
Article, other 6 3 4 4 3 5 8 33 15.2% 0
Conference paper, peer review NA 2 NA NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0
Conference paper, other 17 16 19 8 5 6 5 76 0.0% 0
Book NA 5 3 3 2 4 3 20 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 13 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 9 22 22 23 34 23 8 141 0.0% 0
Article, book review 5 3 4 4 2 7 6 31 54.8% 0
Report 1 4 4 4 4 2 3 22 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 7.6 7.8 1.0 4.0 53.0%
2015 1.1 42.1 38.0 0.1 4.7%
2016 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0%
2017 2.8 8.7 3.1 0.8 30.0%
2018 10.4 23.8 2.3 3.5 33.8%
Total 23.9 84.4 3.5 8.4 35.3%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 9.4 2.06 1.2 12.8%
2015-2017 5.6 3.00 1.4 25.1%
2016-2018 13.9 1.61 3.3 23.6%
2017-2019 16.7 1.08 2.3 13.6%
Total 26.1 1.43 3.5 13.3%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 2 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 15.7%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 27.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 9.4 1.30 3.2 34.3%
2015-2017 5.9 1.57 2.1 34.9%
2016-2018 14.1 1.24 3.0 21.2%
2017-2019 18.0 1.00 2.9 16.2%
2018-2020 26.1 1.12 4.0 15.5%
Total 38.2 1.17 7.6 19.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 27.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 15 1 6.7% 8 53.3%
2015-2017 12 2 16.7% 5 41.7%
2016-2018 22 1 4.5% 9 40.9%
2017-2019 33 1 3.0% 18 54.5%
2018-2020 45 0 0.0% 24 53.3%
Total 67 2 3.0% 36 53.7%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 33.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 20 15 4 1 0 6.8
United Kingdom 15 8 6 1 0 2.5
Norway 6 5 1 0 0 2.3
Netherlands 14 8 5 1 0 2.2
Estonia 3 2 1 0 0 2.1
Belgium 4 2 1 1 0 1.2
Germany 6 4 1 1 0 1.0
Russian Federation 4 4 0 0 0 1.0
Australia 7 2 4 1 0 0.9
Spain 4 2 1 1 0 0.9
Italy 4 2 1 1 0 0.8
South Africa 5 2 3 0 0 0.5
Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Denmark 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
China 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Switzerland 2 1 0 1 0 0.3
Kenya 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Japan 3 1 1 1 0 0.3
Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Peru 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Bangladesh 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Canada 4 0 4 0 0 0.2
Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Viet Nam 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
India 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
Argentina 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Brazil 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
Mexico 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Kyrgyz Republic 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Malaysia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Nepal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Colombia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Swedish National Defence College University College Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 3.0
Stockholm University University Sweden 7 5 2 0 0 2.3
University of Tartu University Estonia 3 2 1 0 0 2.1
Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) Institute United States 4 3 1 0 0 1.7
University of Stavanger University Norway 3 2 1 0 0 1.7
Wageningen University and Research Centre University Netherlands 8 5 3 0 0 1.4
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point (UWSP) University United States 5 2 2 1 0 1.1
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 2 2 0 0 0 1.1
University of California, San Diego University United States 3 2 1 0 0 1.1
Princeton University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
University of California, Berkeley University United States 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona University Spain 3 2 1 0 0 0.9
National Research University Higher School of Economics University Russian Federation 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Australian National University University Australia 5 2 3 0 0 0.8
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 4 2 2 0 0 0.8
European University at Saint Petersburg (EUSP) University Russian Federation 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Yale University University United States 3 2 0 1 0 0.7
Luleå University of Technology University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Lund University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Stanford University University United States 2 1 0 1 0 0.5
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Bari Aldo Moro University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Coimbra University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of East London (UEL) University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Manchester University United Kingdom 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
Stellenbosch University University South Africa 3 1 2 0 0 0.4
Erasmus University Rotterdam University Netherlands 3 1 2 0 0 0.4
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Harvard University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Leiden University University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Hong Kong University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Uppsala University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
City, University of London University United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Imperial College London University United Kingdom 3 1 2 0 0 0.3
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) Institute Japan 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NIFU Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Kenya (TU-K) University Kenya 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Catania University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Condesan Other Peru 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Centre for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS) Other Public Bangladesh 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Florida State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Makerere University University Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ochanomizu University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Groningen University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oklahoma University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oslo University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Sheffield University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of South Carolina University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Tromsø University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Birmingham University United Kingdom 3 0 3 0 0 0.2
Seton Hall University University College United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) Institute Sweden 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
University of Bremen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Helsinki University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Leeds University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of North Carolina at Greensboro University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Aarhus University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Can Tho University University Viet Nam 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Gerda Henkel Fdn NA Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Leicester University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Sussex University United Kingdom 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
CICERO Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res Oslo NA Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Finnish Meteorol Inst Institute Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Nordland Research Institute Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
North-West University University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Russian Academy of Sciences Other Public Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Umeå University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Antwerp University Belgium 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education Institute Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences University College Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Other Public Australia 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
Arizona State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
James Cook University University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Autonomous University of Mexico University Mexico 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Swinburne University of Technology University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Nacl San Martin University Argentina 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of California, Santa Barbara University United States 2 0 1 1 0 0.1
University of Oxford University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Utrecht University University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cardiff University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Soc Hydrologists & Meteorologists SOHAM Nepal NA Nepal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Tribhuvan Univ University Nepal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Cent Asia University Kyrgyz Republic 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of British Columbia University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University Putra Malaysia (UPM) University Malaysia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Other South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Institute Kenya 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
McGill University University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Other Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) Institute India 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University College London University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Boston College University College United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Carnegie Mellon University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
European Soc Environm Hist NA Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
George Mason University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Georgetown University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Kruger Natl Pk NA South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Renmin Univ China University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
State Univ Goias University Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Stony Brook University, The State University of New York University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
UniEVANGELICA NA Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Alberta University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Los Andes (Uniandes) University Colombia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Montreal University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Wisconsin - Madison University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Western Washington University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Aberystwyth University University College United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Columbia University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Concordia University University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Lancaster University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Monash University University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
New York University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Queen’s University Belfast University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of London University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of New South Wales University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Sydney University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Trieste University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Vienna University Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Wollongong University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Bangor Univ NA United Kingdom 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Bangor University University United Kingdom 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Biobot Analyt LLC Company United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
BORON BIOL INC NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA) Institute Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Federal University of Bahia University Brazil 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Georgia Institute of Technology University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Georgia State University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Hampton Rd Sanitat Dist NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Hokkaido University University Japan 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Howard University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Indian Institutes of Technology University India 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Inst Agrochem & Food Technol IATA CSIC NA Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Italian Natl Inst Hlth NA Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Jaume I University University Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
KWR Water Res Inst NA Netherlands 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research Institute Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Michigan State University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
North Carolina State University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Osnabrück University University Germany 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Rice University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Southern Nevada Water Author NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) University Switzerland 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Toyama Prefectural University University Japan 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
Tufts University University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
UNC Chapel Hill Inst Marine Sci NA United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Arizona University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Barcelona University Spain 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Bath University United Kingdom 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Calabria University Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Michigan University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Notre Dame University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Pisa University Italy 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Queensland University Australia 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Southern California University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Washington University United States 1 0 0 1 0 0.0
University of Yamanashi University Japan 1 0 0 1 0 0.0

Open Access

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 14 4 0 0 1 3 10 28.6%
2015 9 3 2 0 0 1 6 33.3%
2016 5 2 1 1 0 0 3 40.0%
2017 18 9 4 2 2 1 9 50.0%
2018 21 12 2 4 2 4 9 57.1%
2019 22 13 4 7 1 1 9 59.1%
2020 28 24 3 19 0 2 4 85.7%
Total 117 67 16 33 6 12 50 57.3%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

HISTORY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 7.6 32.5 4.3 0.0 0.0%
2015 3.1 197.6 64.7 1.0 32.7%
2016 3.7 38.5 10.4 1.0 27.0%
2017 5.4 33.1 6.1 0.3 6.1%
2018 9.4 59.8 6.4 2.0 21.6%
2019 9.3 16.6 1.8 3.7 39.6%
2020 11.4 15.2 1.3 7.2 63.6%
Total 49.9 393.2 7.9 15.3 30.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with poor Scopus coverage (at least 43.3%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 12.3 1.94 2.5 20.3%
2015-2017 10.0 3.00 2.9 28.6%
2016-2018 14.3 2.82 5.3 36.8%
2017-2019 19.3 1.69 4.1 21.0%
Total 31.7 1.79 6.6 20.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 20 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 51.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 11.8 1.17 2.8 23.7%
2015-2017 9.9 1.54 5.7 57.4%
2016-2018 15.6 1.30 8.6 54.8%
2017-2019 21.7 1.15 9.6 44.5%
2018-2020 25.5 1.15 9.3 36.6%
Total 41.9 1.20 15.7 37.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 20 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 51.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 19 0 0.0% 10 52.6%
2015-2017 19 0 0.0% 7 36.8%
2016-2018 26 0 0.0% 10 38.5%
2017-2019 37 0 0.0% 18 48.6%
2018-2020 48 0 0.0% 26 54.2%
Total 77 0 0.0% 40 51.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 19 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 50%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row